Ocean waves crash over a seawall and into houses along the coast in Scituate, Mass., Thursday, March 7, 2013. A winter storm brought strong winds to coastal areas in the state. (AP Photo:Steven Senne)

Get the best Credit Tips at Credit Visionary

These aren’t fun times for stock fund supervisors.

While mutal fund investors have actually delighted in a pretty wonderful 2013 up until now, funds have been quietly shaking up their management groups ‘at a worrying clip,’ according to UNITED STATE News and World Report’s Ron Silverblatt.

But so what? If funds are doing well and investors are pleased, why should we care?

‘Management changes can have a broad range of implications,’ Silverblatt discusses. ‘First, a brand-new manager can mean a modification in a fund’s method, which in turn can suggest that a product that was when a good fit for an investor no longer belongs because investor’s portfolio.’

On top of that, management has every little thing to do with fund performance. He mentions a 2010 report by the United Kingdom’s Pensions Institute which discovered ‘losing a top-decile supervisor results in a 1.44 portion points lower efficiency in the following year compared to winner funds that keep their star supervisor.’

That was based upon the efficiency of almost 4,000 UNITED STATE equity funds between 1992 and 2007.

So exactly what’s a worried investor to do when the higher-ups get shaken up?

Study the new supervisor’s track record then hang on tight, Silverblatt says: ‘It’s often sensible for investors to offer the new management team a bit of time to prove itself.’

Join the conversation about this story »