marines helicopter supply military

Get the best Credit Tips at Credit Visionary

On Sept. 11, 2011, an Armenian provider from Albania landed in Benghazi, Libya.

It was bring 800,000 rounds of ammunition originating from Albanian surplus stocks.

Three of those stocks belonged to militaries of the United Arab Emirates, according to a 2013 United Nations investigation.

Planes from Albania, which also included weapons shipments from Ukraine, were continuing to put into civil war-torn Libya, despite an arms embargo – and the Obama administration was cognizant of exactly what was occurring, according to numerous sources who spoke to TheBlaze.

But exactly what’s the procedure for shipping hundreds of millions – if not billions – of dollars worth of weapons and ammunition from one country to someone else?

And is it possible for the country of beginning to provide those weapons discreetly, leaving a ‘zero footprint’ in the nation where the weapons are delivered too?

American arms dealerships are intimately knowledgeable about the procedure. In reality, the U.S. topped the list as the biggest global supplier of significant weapons from 2009 to 2013, asing per a report released by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, which performs study on dispute, arms control and disarmament.

According to the institute, the U.S. in 2013 accounted for 45 percent of arms shipment to Persian Gulf states, consisting of the UAE and Qatar, and has actually currently signed agreements that’ll enable it to keep high levels of arms exports to these nations.

Wednesday’s season ending episode of TheBlaze TV’s For the Record will take viewers back to the night of the deadly 2012 Benghazi attacks with those who existed, and expose exactly how Al Qaeda militants benefited from the huge weapons being provided by the UAE and Qatar with a minimum of tacit approval of the Obama administration.

The Purchase of Arms

iraqi soldiers m1abrams tank

A U.S. arms dealer who talked with TheBlaze on condition of privacy explained the tedious process of getting approval for weapons transfers, and the problems that emerge when the freight isn’t closely kept track of by intelligence or military officials on the ground.

In Libya, the failure of the United States and NATO to appropriately monitor the weapons being shipped by the UAE and Qatar in 2011 and 2012 gave Al Qaeda members embedded within the rebel compels a benefit and permitted others to develop their collections.

The arms dealership, who holds all of the appropriate licenses with the U.S. government, works in a world couple of have actually ever seen.

He’s actually taken a trip throughout the Middle East and South Asia, and described a world where arms dealers work out advantageous and biggest bulk of weapons supplies. Everything is done with the knowledge of those in the ‘have to know’ at State Department.

The weapons dealership stated the primary step is asking ‘the State Division under your license for a prior approval or request.’ The dealer then gets the ‘end-user certificate,’ he stated, which originates from the country where the weapons are being delivered to and is made use of in worldwide transfers and sales to license that the purchaser is the final recipient of the products. It also prevents the transfer of weapons to someone else celebration.

In Afghanistan, as an example, either the minister of defense or the minister of interior would provide the end-user statement.

Then the haggling begins.

End-user certification in hand, the weapons dealer starts getting bids, taking a trip to nations like Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Serbia and Ukraine – wherever a storage facility of weapons could be found – and quotes on those weapons versus other arms dealerships from worldwide.

‘They’d not even talk with you unless you’d that end-user certificate,’ the dealership said.

Once the end-user certificate is signed, it’s back to the customer, who’s supplying the weapons to their location nation – normally a U.S. government agency. The ‘customer will then turn around and provide an agreement and afterwards wire funds.’

‘Then you can start procuring,’ the arms dealership said, describing the real purchase and option of weapons.

Before the procedure is complete, the prior approval request that’d been to the end-user gets staffed out to a minimum of five agencies, four within the State Department and one with the Department of Defense, for approval.

Once the permission is total, the procedure repeats itself ‘to some extent’ so there are a number of checks and balances, he said. The export committee in the country where the arms are being purchased from will ask the dealer for the approval documents currently submitted to the State Department and for the end-user arrangement.

‘If you are procuring within Bulgaria … under NATO laws there’s a confirmation process with the State Division,’ the dealer said. ‘So the Bulgarian export committee would then contact the U.S. Defense attache and ask, ‘is this a confirmed transaction? Can [this individual] send this equipment to Kabul?’ And they’ll respond back and this memo will get back to the export committee, ‘yes it’s authorized.’ OK, now then an export license is released.’

After the approvals have actually happened, the weapons dealership can begin organizing their logistics and transport.

It’s normally done on a ‘free-carrier’ basis – you ‘get your equipment at the flight terminal which is currently cleared by custom-mades, and afterwards you start to deliver,’ he stated.

And when it gets to the other end, there are more checks and balances, through a delivery confirmation certificate.

‘The end user within that country then signs off on that statement, and … they are clear to take that equipment to the stockroom where it would be going,’ the dealer stated.

Because of all these steps it would ‘practically impossible’ for the U.S. government to be unaware of any deal, he said.

‘Zero Footprint’

There’s a means for nations to bypass the legal weapons deals, he stated. It’s very risky.

The country can outsource the weapons purchase ‘to a foreign ally to manage 3 components: procurement, transport and logistics.’

But ‘even that part isn’t 100 percent untraceable, but it’s a good step if you wish to eliminate all U.S. participation,’ he stated.

The Obama administration ‘had to have actually been aware’ and at least tacitly permitted Qatar and the UAE to acquire and deliver weapons to Libya, he stated.

‘The consequences are that you lose instant control over the end-user, and you allow them to manage your logistics and transport so that it avoids you from identifying who this devices is going to fall under,’ the arms dealer stated. ‘So if you don’t put your protocols in place and you do not deliver it to vetted sources that devices might end up anywhere, and it’s your name on it, it’s gonna be on the end-user statement if it gets re-transferred to the wrong workers.’

Some of those end users ended up being Al Qaeda and extremist militants.

But having the UAE and Qatar deliver the weapons ‘gives the U.S. government probable deniability.’

SEE LIKEWISE: This Chart Demonstrates how The Remainder of the World Doesn’t Even Come Close To US Military Spending

Join the conversation about this tale »